1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1981 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 455 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |
