1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1982 Jeep CJ7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 454 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 128 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |