1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1982 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 461 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 121 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2530 mm |