1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1986 Citroen BX
To start off, 1986 Citroen BX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 860 kg more than 1986 Citroen BX.
Because 1986 Citroen BX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen BX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen BX. (294 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1986 Citroen BX | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | 62 | BX |
Year Released | 1962 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2139 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 294 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 91.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 81.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |