1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1988 Ferrari Testarossa
To start off, 1988 Ferrari Testarossa is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ferrari Testarossa (385 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ferrari Testarossa should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1988 Ferrari Testarossa.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ferrari Testarossa. (500 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ferrari Testarossa.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1988 Ferrari Testarossa | |
Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
Model | 62 | Testarossa |
Year Released | 1962 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4943 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2560 mm |