1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 Volvo 245
To start off, 1989 Volvo 245 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1989 Volvo 245. (110 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Volvo 245.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volvo 245. (157 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1989 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 245 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2316 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 157 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |