1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1990 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 1990 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chevrolet Suburban (209 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Because 1990 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chevrolet Suburban. (407 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chevrolet Suburban.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1990 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1962 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 407 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3300 mm |