1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. (175 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 579 kg more than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |
