1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Honda Integra
To start off, 1995 Honda Integra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1995 Honda Integra. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1995 Honda Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 856 kg more than 1995 Honda Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 62 | Integra |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |
