1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010
To start off, 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Synergy 2010 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
