1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |
