1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 1996 SsangYong Musso is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1996 SsangYong Musso.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 SsangYong Musso. (307 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1996 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
| Model | 62 | Musso |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 307 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |
