1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1997 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1997 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 62 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5330 mm |
