1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Daewoo Brougham
To start off, 1997 Daewoo Brougham is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1997 Daewoo Brougham. (108 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Daewoo Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1997 Daewoo Brougham. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Daewoo Brougham | |
Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
Model | 62 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |