1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1997 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 745 kg more than 1997 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda RX-7. (271 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2430 mm |
