1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 313 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1997 Renault Helem.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 497 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 62 | Helem |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |
