1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Ford F-150
To start off, 1998 Ford F-150 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford F-150 (203 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford F-150 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1962 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford F-150. (338 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 203 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 338 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3050 mm |