1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Opel Astra
To start off, 1998 Opel Astra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1998 Opel Astra. (64 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Opel Astra.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Opel Astra. (110 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Opel Astra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Opel Astra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | 62 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 44 L |
