1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Renault Espider
To start off, 1998 Renault Espider is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1998 Renault Espider. (191 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Espider.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Espider, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Espider. (277 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Espider.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Renault Espider | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 62 | Espider |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 277 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
