1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | 62 | SS |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 318 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5130 mm |