1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Ford EX
To start off, 2001 Ford EX is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford EX (370 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford EX should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 875 kg more than 2001 Ford EX.
Because 2001 Ford EX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford EX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford EX. (567 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford EX.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Ford EX | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | EX |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 567 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 54 L |