1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Holden GTS
To start off, 2001 Holden GTS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden GTS (692 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 2001 Holden GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Holden GTS | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | GTS |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 692 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
