1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Nissan Moco
To start off, 2001 Nissan Moco is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Moco. (53 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Moco. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 945 kg more than 2001 Nissan Moco. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Nissan Moco is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Moco will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 519 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Moco. (63 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Moco.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Nissan Moco | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Moco |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 63 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |