1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Jaguar X400
To start off, 2002 Jaguar X400 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2002 Jaguar X400.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jaguar X400. (525 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jaguar X400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Jaguar X400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | X400 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 525 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 69 L |
