1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | 62 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |
