1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1265 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | eK |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2350 mm |