1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Chrysler Airflite
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Airflite is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 455 kg more than 2003 Chrysler Airflite.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler Airflite. (341 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler Airflite.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Chrysler Airflite | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | Airflite |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 253 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 341 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 81 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 100 L |
