1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 375 kg more than 1962 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. (440 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | 62 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 100 L |
