1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Subaru B
To start off, 2003 Subaru B is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru B (389 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru B should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 475 kg more than 2003 Subaru B.
Because 2003 Subaru B is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru B will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru B. (550 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru B.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Subaru B | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | 62 | B |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 389 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 550 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |