1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 847 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.

Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac 62 2004 Ford Ranger
Make Cadillac Ford
Model 62 Ranger
Year Released 1962 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6388 cc 4015 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 207 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 323 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2055 kg 1208 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 5130 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 74 L