1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Isuzu Axiom
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 132 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Axiom.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. (334 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Axiom.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Isuzu Axiom | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | 62 | Axiom |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 74 L |