1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Italdesign Visconti
To start off, 2004 Italdesign Visconti is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Italdesign Visconti (399 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Italdesign Visconti should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Because 2004 Italdesign Visconti is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Italdesign Visconti will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Italdesign Visconti (680 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 2004 Italdesign Visconti will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Italdesign Visconti | |
| Make | Cadillac | Italdesign |
| Model | 62 | Visconti |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 399 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 680 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2830 mm |
