1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 219 kg more than 1962 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 106 L |
