1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 258 kg more than 1962 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (427 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Sequoia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 99 L |
