1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2004 Westfield ZEI is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Westfield ZEI. (174 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield ZEI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1385 kg more than 2004 Westfield ZEI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Cadillac | Westfield |
Model | 62 | ZEI |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2340 mm |