1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 525 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | K2700 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |