1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2005 MCC ForTwo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2005 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1325 kg more than 2005 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC ForTwo. (80 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2005 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | 62 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 80 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1810 mm |