1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Dodge Charger. (570 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Charger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 6063 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 72 L |