1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C

To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C. (350 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercedes-Benz C.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac 62 2006 Mercedes-Benz C
Make Cadillac Mercedes-Benz
Model 62 C
Year Released 1962 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6388 cc 3498 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 350 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2055 kg 1695 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 62 L