1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Opel Astra
To start off, 2006 Opel Astra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 862 kg more than 2006 Opel Astra.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Opel Astra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | 62 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1278 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 52 L |
