1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Opel Tigra

To start off, 2006 Opel Tigra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2006 Opel Tigra. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Opel Tigra.

Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Tigra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Opel Tigra. (125 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Opel Tigra.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac 62 2006 Opel Tigra
Make Cadillac Opel
Model 62 Tigra
Year Released 1962 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 1364 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 125 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 73.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 80.6 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 45 L