1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2007 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mitsubishi Raider (220 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Because 2007 Mitsubishi Raider is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mitsubishi Raider will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mitsubishi Raider. (277 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Raider |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 277 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 82.8 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3340 mm |
