1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Saturn Aura
To start off, 2007 Saturn Aura is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2007 Saturn Aura. (164 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Saturn Aura.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Aura, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Saturn Aura. (216 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Saturn Aura.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Saturn Aura | |
Make | Cadillac | Saturn |
Model | 62 | Aura |
Year Released | 1962 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 216 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 61 L |