1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu I-350. (328 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | 62 | I-350 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 328 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |