1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 265 kg more than 2009 Cadillac CTS.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (300 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac 62 2009 Cadillac CTS
Make Cadillac Cadillac
Model 62 CTS
Year Released 1962 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6388 cc 3175 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 215 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 300 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 88 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2055 kg 1790 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 68 L