1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 440 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze. (142 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 142 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |