1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Ford F-450
To start off, 2009 Ford F-450 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-450 (814 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 2009 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | F-450 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 326 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 814 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 6670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 4390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 144 L |