1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E

To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. (168 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 690 kg more than 1962 Cadillac 62.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. (400 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac 62 2009 Mercedes-Benz E
Make Cadillac Mercedes-Benz
Model 62 E
Year Released 1962 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6390 cc 2148 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 582 Nm 400 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 88.3 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2140 kg 2830 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 80 L