1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (265 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2010 Audi A5.
Because 2010 Audi A5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi A5. (329 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi A5.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Audi A5 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | A5 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 329 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4625 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |