1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 515 kg more than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (349 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | TT |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 349 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4199 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1351 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |